Hello,
For those who remember, I was a former volunteer dev / proj mgr / comm mgr for Cinni. Please allow me to clear the FUD on rynomster's name (as this was brought to my attention by trolls posting in XC's thread).
Rynomster came to help Cinni with it's encrypted messaging system (per a bounty). After this work was finished, he himself decided to not continue on with Cinni (for his own reasons, which frankly should not matter). His contribution towards the Cinni project started on good terms, and he left Cinni project on good terms -- as far as the dev team was concerned.
As for the issue related to Cinni PoS, I can verify that rynomster did indeed email fixes to the PoS code to cinnidev. And to my knowledge, cinnidev committed them (however, if cinnidev truly committed them will need to be verified by cinnidev / rynomster). Now, whether or not rynomsters fixes corrected absolutely every issue with Cinni's PoS, I cannot answer -- but I do know that rynomster emailed fixes on the PoS code.
Nevertheless -- why are we attacking rynomster? If you are going to call him a liar, then you will have to call both myself and cinnidev liars. But let me ask you -- who else would know the facts better than the dev team? Cinnidev likewise can and should confirm everything that I have said. Anyone who says anything contrary to the facts that I have just stated is a liar, or is ignorant to what actually happened.
Again, rynomster was offered a bounty to build encrypted messaging for Cinni -- this he did in a successful and timely manner. Once this work was completed, he was by no means obligated to continue developing for Cinni. Even Cinni's PoS issue he was not obligated to look at or fix, but he was kind enough to. Please refrain from attacking him, his character, or his new coin.
battbot
Who are you trying to fool battbot ??
I can post dozens of lies and yours Rynomster
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=573232.9420https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=573232.msg7283366#msg7283366https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=573232.msg7291667#msg7291667https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=573232.msg7300907#msg7300907https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=573232.msg7310632#msg7310632The anon feature that was proposed to be developed was obviously canceled. I planned to have rynomster develop this feature. But he decided to end his connections with CinniCoin before this could ever come to fruition. Again, rynomster was not obligated to develop anything for Cinni beyond the Encrypted Messaging system which he agreed to do for a bounty. So I could not force him to develop anything beyond this.
Quit acting like you know the facts. All you are doing is interpreting the situation in the worst possible light. I am sorry if you lost money on Cinni, but again, you do not know the facts or the conversations that went on behind this public thread.
You really have some nerve popping up back here and trying to assume some moral high ground (unsuccessfully).
Before the links above were shared by tevayo (good work!), you conveniently left out the fact that you repeatedly promised EM-based anon tech as a game-changer and left around the time rynomaster declared "family emergencies" which were implied to be temporarily - and you likely sold your CINNI stash in the days/weeks leading up to that and/or during that, while keeping CINNI holders in the dark until you made your absence, which had already been virtual for a few weeks up to that point, official.
You were already becoming disengaged well before you officially made your announcement because you knew the truth - that the anon tech wasnt comming and CINNI was dead in the water -- likely acted on that insider info in the markets, and didn't share it publicly on the board as a "community manager".
I figure the only reason you're back is because you perceive a small threat to your interests - either to your XC holdings, SDC holdings(?), or to a relationship with rynomaster that you might hope to exploit in the future.