I recall a while back an upstanding NXT member getting robbed and ended up outing the completely wrong dude for the theft.
All I'm saying is Bittrex should be very careful and think through what they give out.
That being said you can have two views (mostly dependant on if you got burned or not):
1) traders blame themselves <- my point of view, but then again I sold at a 10% loss.
2) bittrex refunds cluster ico (this should only be done if the product promised is not delivered regardless of what price it trades at - according to contract, else you kill your own crediblity as an escrow)
+1
I do believe that IF some substantial evidence is produced to bittrex clearly out lining that CLSTR is the same person as USE and it could be used to prevent legal action against bittrex then and ONLY THEN is it possible for bittrex to void the terms and conditions set out for the ICO.
At this point in time all agreements have been met and there is no substantial evidence to prove otherwise.