It is illuminating how, after the "Every single coin is shit except monero" thread was forensically exposed as a lie, the Monero shills squeal like piggies! 
If by "forensically exposed" you mean changing web sites after the fact and by producing even more faked documents and signatures that can't be verified by any third party to have ever existed before, then yeah, exactly.
Fail.
I don't know this person but he said it well (oh, and look who is providing this bogus "proof'" in that other thread -- what a surprise):
Look at this. I checked the snapshots of CSS files RethinkYourStrategy posted here and this is what I found. It dont match. I checked every web page myself and the CSS code from his snapshots is different from the reality. Since I found this I dont trust his research anymore. Every single thing that he claims must be doublechecked.
Obviously, the CSS has been changed to no longer reflect the original findings. There is no reason such a change would not be made.
Checking website contents or adding new website as proof for something, in such a way that it cannot be verified with archive.org, after the time of this reveal does not prove anything, because websites are easily created, modified and timestamps are trivial to falsify.
As we are all here for the purpose of reasonable discourse, I hope for your understanding and hope that no more of this type of unreliable evidence is posted.