Again with Coinware/Liquidbits!  Why?  What's the point? Am I responsible for bringing the topic back?  All I said initially what that I feared we might come to regret their proposition.  Perhaps I should have said "Let's do everything in our limited power to not come to regret their plan".  Let's move on already! They have not been in the loop for some time now, other than being a creditor -- and by very far the largest of all, from what I have read.  They made a proposition to the committee, they argued for it in court and answered questions on this forum (no one else so far did the same). The committee rejected it, the judge rejected their deadline, they went their way.  Is there more, besides the very easily verifiable fact that neither Coinware nor Liquidbits are registered in the British Ocean Territory but in the United States of America?  If anything, the above posts seem to indicate that Coinware / LQB would have had the financial wherewithal to actually pull off the creditor's mega-mine -- but then, again, how is it relevant today?  Who cares?  That ship sailed a while back.  End of story.

The committee said they had other offers on the table, the only thing we saw was the CRO being nominated.  

I think that the only thing that really matters today is: Are there indeed other propositions on the table and if so what might they be?  I have not been able to find out (besides the eventual, possible, nebulous projects such as the Franchise mine for which I never could find any details besides rumors).  The CRO is quiet, perhaps he is working out a deal, or simply preparing to liquidate what's left of the assets at auction.  Anyone knows?  That would be the "gist" of the situation.  The committee should know.  I am sure they are in contact with the CRO.  It is sensible.  Can't they give us any information?  It's hard to imagine that "nothing" is going on.