Post
Topic
Board Hardware
Re: [ANN] OpenBitASIC : The Open Source Bitcoin ASIC Initiative
by
rjk
on 17/04/2012, 17:44:12 UTC

Well that's fucked up, can't they take a "general" design and adapt it to their processes as part of the mask fee?

Yes and no. A synthesizable design, aka soft core can be ported relatively easy between different processes.  You can think of it as the source code of the chip which has to be compiled for a process.

But thats not the problem; what we call a process, consists of pre-made transistor designs and a whole set of design rules. Thats different for every process, and almost every fab. So you once you "compile" your design and generate a mask, its no longer portable and you will still need a specific mask for every process.

Since the cost of that mask is what is preventing ASICs from being available today, I dont really see what problem open sourcing a design would solve. It might be neat project for a hardware engineer, but who's going to pay the mask? And why wouldnt he use a less portable, but better optimized design?

Well, I think the problem that was wanting to be solved was for everything to be open and accessible, but now that I understand the NDAs are to protect the fabs, and not so much for the people funding the devices, I see now that this may be unachievable. Too bad there are no current-generation "open source" foundries.