That rational just does not suffice. If enough share holders get together we could buy out all add space with only 0.01 BTC from each person. I don't see where the opposition to this is stemming from. With the start of round two it is a perfect time market aggressively. Miners are being sold fully assembled and competition is initiating the sale of preorders (SP-tech).

You must ask yourself, what is the opportunity cost of not doing this?

Given enough people participate, each share holder puts 0.01 BTC into a trusted member's escrow.

The result:

1) Greater visibility. - More products sold will directly affect your dividend.

2) If competitors are to have add space they must now pay much more since we can greatly outbid as a whole with minimal addition to each person's contribution. This increases overhead and I'm sure you can put it together from there.

3) A crowd funded marketing campaign relieves AM from paying which means less overhead. It's effectively a wash since the cost would come out of your dividends regardless.

There is power in numbers and we can use that to our advantage.

Can you please counter this?