I want to make a statement for the record to address both the individuals who wish to provide negativity within this forum and to those who are naysaying those who are providing said negativity.
If there is a constructive piece of criticism you have--something perhaps that you think Pandacoin is not doing quite correctly, or something that we ought to be doing that we aren't-- please provide it, and support your statement as well as you can with logic and reason, and we will all engage in a reasoned and intelligent discussion with you. In fact, we may even come to the decision that you are correct, and adopt some of your ideas.
However, if your intention is to merely provide something along the lines of "This coin will fail" or "Enjoy the dump" without any kind of discussion or constructive criticism, there's absolutely nothing to be said to you, for you provide nothing substantive, and merely exist here to harm the individuals in this community.
Tl;DR: If you have criticism, provide it with argumentation and logic. If you don't, you won't get a kind reception if you merely FUD.
I have some constructive criticism for you:
- you emited all the coins in advance and then confuse people by saying they can mine the coin (with a browser - ha ha ha)
- you have almost nothing new to offer that hasn't been here before
- you think that visually attractive website will save lack of real improvements
anyway, this coin will die alongside with Dogecoin and pretty much all the altcoins that didn't bring any innovations.
Great, it's working.
Facts are so easily checked.
1a. there was no premine.
1b. you CAN mine the coin on the multipool (sustaining the price)
1c. the devs never said you can mine on a browser (there is a "leak", but we'll have to wait two days more)
2.
almost nothing new = among the many features,
some are new
3. lol. If it were 31 august and the devs
didn't deliver the updates, you could say that.
As a sidenote, for criticism to be
constructive it shoud have at least some kind of suggestion on how to make improvements. Not saying that criticism can't be positive without being constructive, btw, but that's not the case.