Nice signature.
LTC: selling misinformation (at best) or flat out lies since when there was chance for an altcoin to exist.
Monero, boolberry, cryptonite: all based on same tech, all apparently having something not quite right.
Not encouraging VTC or MYR... sorry Sir, I totally disagree with you!
LOL, lots of people are getting the false impression that Crypton
ite is a Crypton
ote-based coin, but it's not.
XCN is based on mini-blockchains, which are completely incompatible with CN's ring signatures.
I'm trying to get BitFreak to change the name to something less tremendously confusing to non-specialists, and more distinct and descriptive (such as 'MiniCoin') but it's like pulling teeth.
You'd think no coin had ever successfully changed it's name/ticker before, despite the example of BitMonero/Monero/MRO/XMR.
You'd think no coin had ever successfully recycled an abandoned name before, despite the example of ByteCoin.
You'd think a simple re-branding of an obscure month-old coin, with scant volume on a mere handful of exchanges, is equivalent to a hard fork and re-launch, but it isn't.
(XPOSTed to XCN thread)