I don't appreciate being told that we'll only re-brand with a Great Name, when 1) the existing name is demonstrably very shitty and 2) I've gone out of my way to provide a Less Shitty/Good Enough alternative in the form of MiniCoin.
Why would I change the name to something less than great? I have no reason to go to all the effort required if the new name isn't great, and so far most of the names suggested are very sub-par. You're lucky I'm even entertaining the idea of a name change at all, I've already wasted more than 12 hours of my life contemplating names and finding something which wasn't already taken. Now it's like I have to go through all that crap again because some people are worried about a little overlap with another popular coin. The name is only shitty if you believe that overlap is very problematic, and I don't. Have you ever thought that maybe that popularity could cause more people to check out Cryptonite?