The GUI wallet was not "recently developed." It was
released on June 6, and recently rereleased. There is no real development going on here. The lead developer pops in every once in a while and makes some posts, what he does the rest of the time I have no idea, but it has little to do with the coin.
The thread itself is kept alive by a series of one- or two-line posts that are almost always devoid of real content (usually some form of cheerleading or inane comment). I have no idea if these are deliberate sock puppets or bots that are mining post counts for sig campaigns. Almost certainly one or the other (or both).
You are witnessing a coin-mill clone coin in the caretaker phase. More info:
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=740112.0I looked at the link of the June 6 "release" and what I saw was not an official release. The developer working on the wallet just mentioned that he made a wallet for the Macintosh and provided a link to it. It was news to the main developer, so it can't be called an official release? The recent release included Linux, Windows and Macintosh versions and there may have been a lot of work that has gone into it after June 6. If you are going by what github shows, well developers usually work on the software on their own machines and don't upload changes to github until they are confident about them. If you are going by github, that's not a reliable way to know whether the developers are doing any work.
And saying that a coin is dead, what does that mean? I would say, a coin has no future if it has problems and no one is willing to fix them. But that is not the case with Quazarcoin.
Work may have gone into the GUI, that is true. How much I don't know. But it certainly wasn't "recently developed" it was "developed" at least to the point of usability back in June, and possibly improved later.
Nevertheless I stand by my opinion that not much is going on here. You may disagree, fair enough. I guess we'll see how it turns out.