Do you guys have problems with substantiating by any chance?
You're really not as good at this as you think you are.
Perhaps, but if the best you guys can do is call my posts "wordplay", you've got nothing.
If you had a case for Jasin being a scammer, it would be pretty simple to establish. Why? Because you'd have proof, and proof is a pretty simple thing.
What you really have here is a long story that
amounts to nothing.