mint pal just posted their requirements to be listed on their exchange and one of them is the coin has to be at least 28 days old then the development team needs to request a review and that takes 7 days and then another 7 days to be listed if it meets requirements ...
so we have a little issue... there one way around this, we can pay a 5 btc fee to be reviewed and listed within 24hrs... I'm thinking this would be a 5 btc well spent, maybe we can raise it in donations from the community and two turtle can help out maybe ?
what do you guys think, I'm going to bed but just throwing that out there...
also syntaks, what are your thoughts on the superNET , sounds extremely interesting, maybe we should consider joining and being a part of that considering it changes nothing for neos core properties. just another thought , if any one wants to know what super net is look into it, there will be at least 100 coins using supernet, and neos has a unique anon feature that I'm sure super net would love to have aboard..
what are your thoughts?
My thoughts on that are this: it's bogus. Paying 5BTC to list a coin whose community wants it there, which shows interest and almost guaranteed volume is wrong. Community demand should be the only reason a coin is added in my opinion. That's like paying a store to put up a rack of the ugliest clothes you'd never buy, just to do it. We'll go where we're wanted, that's for sure. However, where there's potential for substantial trade fees to be made and a strong community demand - I don't see any reason for a fee. Considering the fee mentioned basically contradicts the other stipulations to the tune of validating a coin in the best interest of the people. A scam coin, paid to be listed doesn't make it any less of a scam. It just means less liability for the exchange because the "terms" were met to validate the coin's existence and trustworthiness. Sorry, but the only way you're going to hear it from me is blunt and I'm not liking a lot of what I'm seeing lately.
Sincerely,
syntaks