starik69, please supply current proof to the contrary of what I am saying.
Proof of what?

That new beta was not tested on 250 or 2500 nodes?

But you alredy know that this is the fact.

But in your turn you have no proof of your words - that "ability to scale properly to process transactions at lightning speed" and "will scale almost linear" - this statments are laughable concerning 25 nodes.

All yours and others personall attacks on me clearly shows the lack of arguments on your side and my uncomfortable questions stay unanswered

Bounties and time period is not worth doing it

Prove the recent testing and development have not resolved the sync issues as you claim please.
The proof you are requesting will be made available to you and everyone else in just a few weeks.
The ability to scale can easily be tested by adding more nodes to the network. Whilst testing we started with a base number of nodes. As the tests scaled up (we added more nodes) the capability of the network was indeed very close to linear.
Again you do not have to believe me, the proof will be made available to you and everyone else in just a few weeks.
Personal attacks? Not from me. If you mistook any of my previous statements as a personal attack I believe you're somewhat over sensitive.
That's it? The time period doesn't float your boat and your greedy? So you're still having to find something negative to say instead of something like "Isn't that a crypto first" or "Damn that takes some balls" or even "Not bad, but if it was me I would have (enter constructive criticism here eg:- made a longer time frame and higher bounties)".