If the "compelling evidence" is made public my feedback will be removed. So far the "buyer" of the account is being shady in my opinion. And the original owner is disputing the sale. Something is up, isn't it?
Leaving feedback because of a lack of evidence isn't really a good reason. I don't trust anyone involved in this, so I stay out of it.
Maybe it's a bit of a vicious circle... Buying accounts is a pretty underground activity right now. So people don't trust bought accounts and leave negative feedback to warn others. In turn account buyers try to hide.
However, the circle can be broken from both sides. The buyer can take the first step and be transparent about what happened. That could breed enough trust to get the negative feedback returned.
Except he did post his opinion on what happened, or his version of events, and since it included that the account was bought by necessity, he got negative feedback for it. Not taking sides here, I don't trust anyone involved in this. Quickseller, if he wants to be reputable should have confirmed the account wasn't stolen before buying it. Current owner of Zedicus should have confirmed this. Original owner of zedicus should have been more careful with his account.
And in this case the negative feedback might accomplish something. I know the new owner is signed up for a signature campaign. The negative feedback thing may get him kicked out of that. I hope it will give them an incentive to resolve this particular issue openly.
Except you and others gave him the feedback as soon as he did post openly. If he posts proof, it's also proof he bought the account. Kind of a damned if you do, damned if you don't situation. Makes it really hard to resolve these situations when people leave negative feedback for posting about it. I'm not picking on you specifically, you aren't the only one.