Bankruptcy is one course of action, recapitalization is another. The latter is preferable, unless you want to ensure the lawyers get everything.
Recapitalization would require people to trust HF. Nobody trusts them, thus creditors take matters into their own hands.Not many people in the adult world subscribe to such a childish Bad Guy Scammer caricature of HF.
You apparently believe that
1) HF owes you a fivefold windfall, even if that's not a legal cause for action nor within their financial capacity
and
2) we have a decent chance of recovering some of our windfalls/MPP/backorders after spending HF's few remaining resources on lawyers
Bro, if you believe those two things while sober, we've got to get together and party sometime. I can't wait to hear what other crazy crap you'll say after a few shots!
To be fair, iCEBREAKER, if you want to post here you should let everyone know that your name is ralph and you used to work for Hashfast. You got laid off as you were not adding any value to the estate and were taking its resources at a time it was severely undercapitalized taking money that could have been returned to creditors. In fact, if everything was sold off and EVERYONE was fired when you were, the creditors likely would have recovered all their money. The math is not that complicated.
Just be fair to the others would do not know your full history.
And the "offers" that hashfast was "so diligently" working on were with companies that never paid for the products they agreed to by when it came time to settle. Yes, the deals are in the docs. So is the failure to pay. Read them all. Not just the first act and the cole's notes.