So now your using your conclusion that you drew as basis for your argument? That's convenient.
The only mention was that he was in talks to purchase another company, never said NH, people just assumed.
You might want to re-read those links. It was said quite explicitly on multiple occasions that NH has been contacted and a solution is in the works. NH claims nobody contacted them and no solution is forthcoming because there is nothing to solve. That's a fairly substantial contradiction, don't you think?