I finally got a test environment where two separate nodes are properly communicating the SuperNET at the lowest protocol levels. So I can debug the proper processing and even some functionality between the two nodes
still having some build issues on the third server, but going from loopback to two different servers will get almost all the cases that are needed.
So, this weekend, I might be slower than usual to respond to any posts. Expect the trolls to seize this opportunity to attempt to spread the FUD. I will be closing my browser so any non-response is just because I am too busy. You can always tell them to bet against the SuperNET if they are so sure it wont work
James
James, I have this idea in the back of my head for a while.
Think about a decentralized web hosting service, running on sidechains. Can fit the best with SuperNET.
Lets imagine UNITY-WEB:
- premium decentralized hosting service- not so cheap;
- pay X amount to register a domain/hosting account, which can ONLY be accessed into the NXT wallet, for example;
- have your website/content/secret docs uploaded on your hosting/domain account;
- have an option to make it public or password protected;
Lets imagine UNITY-WEB as a decentralized WWW which is separated, no more govs killing your website/services.
There are several decentralized storage solutions/coins so the storage is not a big issue
decentralized name server is already built into the NXT alias system, so this too is not a big issue
I think this is just a matter of piecing together existing tech and make a nice GUI.
I can offer a bounty for this, but preferably a NXTventure deal modeled after the Privatebet format so that it is fitting into a standard SuperNET model