Regardless what capacity Cara had over at HashFast at the time, the truth of the matter is that once such was published on this forum and elsewhere, NOBODY at HashFast disputed the claim(s) until it was convenient for them to do such, in spite of HashFast's main principals addressing every other issue under the sun at their earliest possible convenience to further ensure garnering more sales.
Fuck, janitor could've pen the email reply, but HashFast was well aware of its existence, yet never commented on it till shit really started hitting the fan and the fictive janitor was let go.
Fuck, janitor could've pen the email reply, but HashFast was well aware of its existence, yet never commented on it till shit really started hitting the fan and the fictive janitor was let go.
You may disregard relevant details, such as the capacity and authority of the respondent, all you like. But a judge won't, as your due diligence lawyer should have advised you.
Make all the noise you want, it will never change the fact that your expectation for a windfall No Matter WhatTM was unreasonable (based on common sense and common law), impossible (based on financial reality), and harmful (because it led people to lose their chance at 105% refunds by gambling on legally unsound wishful thinking).
Many people tried their best to explain this before it was too late, but we were drowned out by the shrieking of trolls like yourself and the rest of your Free Stuff Army.
