QuickSeller, you're either a moron or the hacker of the account. Your 'evidence' is absolutely worthless.
The hacker could've not changed the password on Zedicus until it is sold, and could have changed the email to prevent PM email notifications. Then bayuo could log in, post, and do everything perfectly fine until the day the account is sold - he would've only been alerted that someone hacked his account by then.
Is it strange that he posted about his account being hacked the day he discovered it was hacked?
This is blatantly obvious. The fact that you are not mentioning this makes me believe you are the person who hacked the account, or working together with the account hacker.
Thats the only thing im not sure of. Im not sure if Quickseller was the guy who actually did the deed. In other words im not sure if he is the theif as well but Im sure he is a liar and a con and im sure he is the one controlling my Zedicus account.
Here is where you lose credibility. Logic would dictate that you either think that I am the one who hacked your account (or someone associated with someone that hacked your account) and a liar and a con or you could think that I bought your account from someone and is essentially caught in the middle of all this. It would be illogical to have doubts that I hacked your account but still am a liar and a con.
Additionally if you have any idea as to who had "hacked" your account then your beef would be with that person, not with me, nor the person who bought it from me.
The most likely scenario is that you actually did not have your account hacked at all.
@TF that kind of logic is not the logic used in the US court system and the logic does nothing to prove guilt. You are saying that because I presented evidence that points to my innocence but does not prove beyond a reasonable doubt that I am innocent that I am therefore guilty.
Sorry bayuo, I'm allergic to dumb people and your massive 3 year old tantrum just makes you look stupid. I've reached out to reason with you and you just spit out filth. Next time, try to engage someone in a normal manner instead of your weird manic spins. It's funny how much of a fuss you made out this to be but when you have the opportunity to get your account back, you act like a retard. Only wanting to pay admin for your account and not the actual owner of it. Makes sense. All I know is that you fucked up bad.
If badbear/ theymos would like proof or transaction records, I would happily be able to provide them to show that I am not Quickseller. They will be able to see my negotiations with Quickseller including the 1.1 BTC transaction for what I spent on this account on the blockchain.
From now on, I will only be dealing with Quickseller to get my BTC back.
Points and laughs.. Did you really think i was going to give you some btc you moron! I would rather give Theymos 10btc before i give you a red cent. Now tuck your tail between your legs and go crawl back to whatever hole you crawled out of!
Again, loosing credibility. You previously said that you would be willing to pay me what was paid for the account, but now you say that you will not pay anything. You also had people leave trust saying that you are willing to pay me what was paid for the account. If you were lying about that then who is to say that you are not lying about having your account hacked?
Also you are doubting that I was the one who "hacked" your account but you somehow expect me to give it back to you for free. I am pretty sure I am not the only one who sees the disconnect here.
Also you are doubting the way that TF suggested the account was stolen and how to account for the PMs three days before the account was sold to me. If you have an idea as to how the account was hacked then you would have had the opportunity to stop it.
Like I said above the most likely explanation is that you did not have your account hacked, but rather sold the account to me at below market value with the intention of stealing it back from me later.