Right now, Chris has leveraged off the supernet brand to promote his websites. Now I cannot see anything substantial apart from sites anyone could make given enough talent and a few hundred dollars.
Instead of building the user base for the current asset, he creates a new one to get more money.
How would supernet get a return for the money it has helped generate for Chris (which he could not raise in a failed ipo before) and how would the people that purchased assets at inflated prices make their money back.
I'm saying this not out of hate or anything like that, but if this venture by Chris turns sour it would help to tarnish the supernet brand which is what I care about.
I have made advices to Chris, but apparently my English was not so easy to understand for him.
The SuperNET revenue sharing deal was for the coinevolve websites and no assets were involved. It was purely a revenue sharing arrangement.
So, for people that are assuming that these assets are having any direct relation to me or SuperNET, please understand that I am not having any influence on the asset issuings that Chris is doing. I suggest we all wait for the revenues before we make any judgements.
The coinevolve sites that are doing the revenue sharing with SuperNET will likely benefit from the SuperNET userbase
James
P.S. The asset issuer is the most important factor. The second most important is the details of the asset. You need to make sure you understand who the issuer is and what exactly the asset is for.