Personally, I would rather consider the amount in my investment pool and consider the amount that I have in the high risk, the medium risk and the low risk categories. Certainly, I may consider gambling 100% of the high risk allocated amount, and if I am feeling particularly confident about the odds of any particular bet, I might also dedicate some additional percentage of my medium risk funds towards the risky venture... but in the end, all or nothing investment (or gambling) practices remain too extreme for my personal risk tolerances and my own sense of financial security.
So you are basically saying that you are a pussy. Anyone reading this thread with any kind of regularity already knew that.
I'm a professional poker player and I can assure you, most good poker players or gamblers would be very close to all-in on such a bet. They would, at the very least, bet the absolute maximum they can "afford" to lose.
Yes!!! I can tell from your robust and unequaled reasoning that you have very sophisticated skills, truly professional in their very subtlety and deftness.
Surely, i must have been mistaken regarding any attempt to describe moderation and any attempt at describing any strategy going forth as other than 100% in.... Accordingly, YOU, ole wise one, have allowed me to see the light and to recognize that balls to the walls should have been the preferred methodology in these circumstances.
