You're the one that is complaining. You want a higher score in that category than you're entitled to at this point, or any other company gets. Ship more, be patient, receive a higher score for this generation.
I'm pointing out your hypocricy and duplicity. If you call that complaining, so be it. I don't really care what you rate BFL on the guide, but please don't mislead newbies and everyone one else by stating that your guide is unbiased and true. There's nothing unbiased or true about it. It's all how you feel about the subject and damn the facts. You complain that BFL misleads people and here you are doing it. Practice what you preach.
There was 290,000 members on the forums at the time. You chose Theymos as one. Why was I chosen as one of the other two? Why was it 'convenient' that I was chosen to be bombarded with negative trust out of all those possibilities? You could have chosen abandoned accounts, your own accounts or accounts you'd made purposely for the 'experiment' as you called it. Instead, you chose me. Why?
Why should I not pick someone who is actively and prominently spreading false information?
The point is that anyone, no matter how highly or lowly regarded can game the system with ease. Picking an abandoned account that can't defend itself would not prove the point. Picking an account, in this case yours, that would vigorously defend itself and still end up with a shitcan rating illustrates how broken the system is. Or how unbroken it is, perhaps. At least according to Theymos. I am sure you, Bickfailski and I disagree, though.
In bold can easily be contributed to all bitcoin miner manufactures, all of which are gaming the system to their advantage to one extreme or another. Unless, that is, BFL is above that, and there's not one iota nefarious activity stemming from their camp. Ironically, this thread directly and indirectly dictates otherwise.
Is it safe to assume that a next gen BFL product is about to introduced for pre-orders, hence your recent presence to grace us monumental assholes?