I'd have more respect for you people if you had any kind of new evidence in the last 2,000 years.
Supernatural is a term used to explain what the science still can not explain. Only closed minded people think science can explain everything and can not think outside the box.
Science can explain everything. Look at all that was unknown when god was first invented. Soon, science will explain everything.
Mainstream scientific consensus is not powerful enough to explain the evidence for survival:
Here is one example of high-quality evidence of the survival of the personality:
2 page PDF:
http://www.aeces.info/Top40/Cases_51-75/case56_soule-soul.pdf
Quote
Dr. James Hyslop, professor of Logic and Ethics at Columbia University, and one of the most distinguished American psychical researchers, reported the following incident.
[...]
As Sir Wiliam Barrett concluded in his review of the case: "The simplest and most reasonable solution is that the information was derived from the mind of the deceased person."
[...]
As Sir Wiliam Barrett concluded in his review of the case: "The simplest and most reasonable solution is that the information was derived from the mind of the deceased person."
2 page PDF:
http://www.aeces.info/Top40/Cases_51-75/case56_soule-soul.pdf
Is mainstream science going to give us any information at all on this subject? I challenge you to explain the evidence using consensus theories.
Without timely response, it is affirmed that empirical science CANNOT explain everything.