That's a cute guess. And guesses aren't bad things. But for your guesses to amount to knowledge, you have to devise an experiment and get a lot more concrete about things.
These guys are getting really concrete:http://www.iqpr.asia/en/technology/index.html
That link wasn't working in my browser.
However, I also want to say that while:
1. I don't believe in any God and
2. I think that the canonical conceptualization of God is not relevant for science (ie, by definition God is unobservable, not natural, etc)
I don't actually agree with Vod that we should expect science to explain everything. As far as I can tell, there should be plenty of things which are simply not relevant to scientific investigation.
Oh yah, for those that are saying that the Bible is 2000 yrs old, I think that's a simplification. Some of the texts seem to go back at least 3000 years, and are probably dervied in part from other ancient texts (Gilgamesh, for example) others weren't written until hundreds of years after Christ's death. Then again, depending on how your philosophy handles linguistic translations and retranslations of those translations, you might say that the English Christian Bible was written as recently as a few hundred years ago.
Even 200 years ago a smartphone would have seemed godly
Smartphone wouldn't have worked 200 years ago. No way to charge the battery, and no cell towers.
That's not the point anyway. Are you really so stupid you don't see the point?