Might I make a suggestion on the naming issue?

There has been a lot of energy spent on this, but to me the most important thing is what the people who will be marketing BBR wants to do.

It is not like there are many people who will actually be doing marketing work is there? It is very easy to complain about this or that, but unless you are going to step up and be active in marketing this, then it seems that the ones doing the marketing should have the ability to change the name.

So, this debate is not whether you like Boolberry vs Rune, but whether you feel you are better than windjc at marketing and willing to actually do this. If not, then why dont we support windjc's efforts?

you can always keep calling it Boolberry to yourself. as others have said the tech is what matters to most people here, so then why this controversy over the name?

As a community do we want windjc to do the marketing or is there somebody else I dont know about?

So, let us do a poll of who wants to be in charge of marketing this coin. On this list so far is windjc. Any other volunteers? If not, then this matter is pretty clear to me. Have the best person available to do something and then trust them to do it without second guessing everything they do. So we weigh the vote by how many hours you are going to be spending marketing BBR.

Fair enough?

I hope this makes sense. I do have some amount of business experience and this falls into the category of business. Yes, boolberry is a very brandable name, but if the person in charge of the marketing is not liking it, then he wont do anywhere as good of a job unless he gets the name he wants.

So, do you want windjc to be demoralized about being forced to market a name he doesnt feel is right, or do you want to support him (or at least not fight against) so he feels the power of the community behind him. If the tech really is what matters, then please stop arguing about the name.

James