Hi bonesoul, thanks for fast response!
I'll respond you between quotes
Hi andr0x,
Thanks for your kind words.
First of all do you have enough hash-power to mine block alone? I personally prefer and suggest guys to first run with testnet daemon, so that you can make sure everything is working okay (in terms of mining & block submissions)
Currently in groestl I have 15 MH/s by now. You are right, Is a good idea test all in testnet daemon, I will run some test there

.
Other then that which version do you use? A release version or latest development tree?
I'm working directly with last development tree, I see few mins ago, that you commited some changes, I'll do a pull to update my copy

Sure, I'll run some test in daemon test mode before, and later I'll send to you all related logs files (
https://github.com/CoiniumServ/CoiniumServ/wiki/How-to-ask-questions-and-report-bugs%3F )
I'm not 100% sure if digibyte use a specific groestl implementation, I'm based on this comment :
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=408268.msg8888673#msg8888673 and in this pool Digibyte's Groestl information :
https://v2.cryptopoolmining.com/dgb-groestl/index.phpBut if I check digibyte network information directly from daemon it say "difficulty_groestl" : 127.54058916 " and official thread, algo section it say clearly "Groestl" :
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=408268.0 I'm bit confused

I'll run some runs in testnetwork in groestl algo before , and later I'll send to you all logs files

Thanks for all bonesoul and have a nice day!
