I understand the technology idea behind SuperNET - and I think its a good one, but you would have gotten a ton more money if you'd have bothered to explain the financial aspects much better. (Piecing together the NAV funding, the asset NAV funding, and the myriad of ways you expect SuperNET to generate revenue is frankly just a hot mess). It's so bad, everyone I've personally talked to about SuperNET has not invested because they don't understand it.
+1. This is my last, of many, posts / hours on this thread / in the IRC. If I can't understand what you're doing, why would I give you money?
You know I wish more people would have listened when us "Nxters" were yelling from the roof tops about how great the Nxt Asset exchange was and this great programmer who coded the MultiGateway. If more people had listened, instead of dismissed Nxt as some "scam," then these people would already have months of case studies to understand what SuperNet is.
I'm not saying that you, Vlad, were one of these people, but it is a good example of how people really need to invest their time into research and less time into reading troll posts that circulate the forum.
