I think a reasonable valuation is 3x NAV, but if everybody who would buy has already bought, where would the aftermarket demand come from? As most of the core SuperNET owners will be long term HODL, as people discover all the contributors to the SuperNET valuation, the demand will come in from the people that were on the sidelines, or not fully invested.
My primary reason for doing this is not to maximize my personal ROI, but rather to maximize the ROI for the people who bought TOKEN.
Just like all the people that bought my other assets early and BTCD, the ones that spend the time to fully understand or put their trust in me, these are the people that will get the biggest ROI. Long term the NAV based valuation will diminish in importance, and the amount raised the potential for some nice ROI exists.
there is a graphical display being worked on like
http://www.nxttechnologytree.com/James
As someone with experience in stocks, the fact that the IPO was so close to the price of backed assets drew me in. It absolutely should be trading at some multiple of that considering there is dividends on the table. Yet, I'll be the first to admit one of the main reasons I invested what I did was the fact that there was not much hype about it. The first day there was some tweets about how fast the IPO sold out, but that was it. Add that to the fact that not a single person I talked to was willing to invest a significant amount of money in SuperNET due to lack of understanding and there is incredible room for growth.
So, to be clear. Love the fact that you don't hype. I'm not a pump and dump fan. BUT!!! I do think that a comprehensive explanation of the financial aspects of SuperNET is of the utmost importance moving forward. We need one concise place people can read all the numbers, crunch all the math, and figure out for themselves that UNITY is a win at .03, .05, .07 and beyond.
Looking forward to seeing what the group you referenced puts out.