Thanks. I'm surprised how small it is. All it does it changes a couple of
tags and adds the cheat code. I was thinking the cheat code would be buried deep among a bunch of complex unrelated changes but apparently not.<br></div><br>12 hours later, and a thought popped unbidden into my head:<br><br>"Hey, I know why I thought the changes would be bigger... because manl SAID they were bigger!<br><br>Remember this?<br><br><div class="quoteheader"><a href="https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=716312.msg8721964#msg8721964">Quote from: DiceBitcoin on September 08, 2014, 01:31:41 AM</a></div><div class="quote"><div class="quoteheader"><a href="https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=716312.msg8721893#msg8721893">Quote from: dooglus on September 08, 2014, 01:23:33 AM</a></div><div class="quote">How sure can you be that this malicious ex-employee isn't currently draining the bankroll by playing with a leaked seed?<br></div><br>We rolled back the admin update that it was deployed with the buggy code with an older version(lesser features and more PITA for us to do things but works and its made by us).<br></div><br>Rolling back the update resulted in "lesser features and more PITA for us to do things". But the patch that was presented here did nothing other than change the <title> tags and make the site skip some winning nonces.<br><br>Funny how the brain works isn't it?<br></div><br>Lol , that is so true. They didn't need to roll back update this short code was so easy to spot and remove. <br><br>I guess there is argument coming: "We didn't know if he changed some other code or added more malicious code so we rolled back whole update" . <br><br>There are so many contradictions in theirs story , like when they stated on chat that he and gary are the only 2 devs , i mean why would u hide the fact that u got a new employee . <br><br>Its just rly shady story with no proofs whatsoever.