The topic was that you were questioning claims that I was making in this thread, and I was verifying them by posting proof.
So, that's the whole of your concern with world politics; that some actors might be involved in hoaxes? And yet you wonder why I didn't feel the need to continue the debate with you once I realised this.
The whole of my concern
in this thread is to 1) back up the claims that I have made, 2) discredit your claims, 3) call out the people who are laughing or making jokes in this serious thread, and 4) to educate people on the existence of hoax actors used for political ends, in particular the "Big Three".
No need to debate when I have backed up every claim that you have questioned so far.
You may be able to elicit further claims from me, but I have already made plenty.
Also, this claim of yours is discredited for lack of proof:
Because that's who's coming up with these ridiculous conspiracy theories - the government hopes that by publishing the weird, far out and bizarre conspiracies that no one will take the real conspiracies seriously. And you, my friend, are part of the problem, not the solution.
Hoax actors are a very real conspiracy, but this quote shows you are not taking any of this seriously. Where is
your evidence? Which conspiracies are more real than 9/11, Boston, and Sandy Hook?? I would love to discuss your claim, if you don't mind...