...Or maybe
the poster just have some sort of a mental disorder.

Honestly, I find JorgeStolfi's long-winded post more interesting than yours. At least he's talking about bitcoin on a thread which is about bitcoin..
When you are referring to "the poster," you are referring to me.
This is the speculation forum, so I suppose it remains fair to speculate; however, your evidence regarding the extent to which I could have a mental disorder seems to be sparse, at best. In other words, you seem to be engaged in gratuitous name-calling without any evidence and very little substantive discussion of anything of any relevance.
Regarding Jorge as compared with me: I have NO problem with you finding him relatively more interesting than me. That is your personal choice. Also, it does NOT seem to serve any purpose to discuss your personal preferences, so a bit difficult to understand what point you are attempting to get at, here.
Yup. You were lecturing me how bad name-calling is and how you dislike such behavior...
Until I remember one of your post that condone such behavior.

Yes.. "Bulltard" seemed insulting but not "cuntface" or "loser"..

LOL!
Well, at least you have an ability to kind of remember how we began to go down this rabbit hole of a topic; however, you do seem to have a tendency to get caught up into trivial technicalities. Hopefully, you will grow out of this at some point, but probably NOT in the short-term context of our exchanging texts. Sometimes it takes years and experiences to grow out of bad and/or immaturity habits.
I don't think I need to explain this further.. Let's not forget this one so people would see it clearly:
Yes.. more examples of your triviality and your getting caught up in unimportant and NON-substantive points.
You seem to be devolving into a status of wanting to argue, just for the sake of it... and even using the lines that I had used on you, directed towards me? At least you could come up with something a little more substantive and/or original.
Says the guy who suddenly pop out of nowhere and started arguing with me. LOL!
I find some of your logic to be quite strange, and maybe at some point you will understand that there is a difference between substantive and productive engaging and inflammatory engaging? You seem to NOT really recognize the extent to which you have a tendency to employ what appears to be inflammatory engaging. I doubt that you are going to change these ways anytime soon, especially, if you seem to conclude that your purposes are served by such.
and even using the lines that I had used on you, directed towards me?
Because it suits you better than me..

It seems like you were locked up in the basement with nothing but your laptop and desperately seeking for attention in the interwebs
You are NOT really saying much, here.
Because there's really nothing to talk about that... LOL! I can't believe you'd even react with my exit phrase/image.. LOL!
I guess it's probably some sort of a psychological problem.. You'd always find a reason to slap your long-winded post.
I wouldn't be surprised if we later end up with you lecturing me about my grammatical errors. 
You wouldn't be surprised if I were to attempt to correct your grammar because again you are engaging in what seems to be pure speculation that has little to no basis in reality. I hope that your attempts to forecast the price direction of BTC are better than your whimsical attempts to analyze and predict the personalities and behaviors of pseudo-anonymous persons on the internet?