- Start: Friedcat or a board member posts something.
- Relevant comments and questions appear.
- Optionally, some answers appear.
- A couple more relevant comments appear, FUD & speculations starts.
- FUD & speculations overtake the discussion. Off topic, stupid and funny comments (just like this one), haters' comments appear.
- No further information from Friedcat or board member produces extra more of these for very long time.
- Here and there a serious, sophisticated post appears, but is immediately killed with FUD & others.
- Then suddenly, after weeks/months, go to Start.
Yes... clearly anyone who exhibits any concerns or doubts in the months during which there is no new information is "spreading FUD" or a "hater". Couldn't possibly be that such comments are perfectly legitimate in the face of a lack of information, lack of dividends, and a repeated failure to live up to promises/expectations.
No, that would be a misinterpretation of my words. I say that the most relevant comments are likely to be close to FC/board member comment, but this does not mean that ANY other comment is hater/FUD/whatever. I think that is true, you do not?