Your 1st solution doesn't work, it's trivial to change IP.
I said it would
temporarily mitigate an attack while the protocol was adjusted where no IP is needed, WOT can be used.
I do think PoW has no security benefit over PoS, otherwise why would I be calling for an end to PoW, and favoring PoS?
Thank you for your honesty, but it clearly shows that you don't understand how PoW is different:
Is there a rebuttal from the PoS crowd to this:
https://download.wpsoftware.net/bitcoin/pos.pdf... other than "sure, the original PoS ideas were flawed, but the latest MegaUberPoS system gets it right and nobody has figured out exactly how to break it!"
I suppose all the developers that work with PoW are equally as misguided as me, right?
Unless your WOT mining is already implemented, your temporary solution will buy you 1 hour at best, if the attacker was already prepared to change IP, it won't even take 1 hour, just a few seconds. Who's going to wait months for Bitcoin to implement WOT mining while the entire network is being disabled?
A PoW developer is naturally entrenched in the PoW mindset, I'm not surprised at all. They will think PoW is superior, until the day Bitcoin PoW fails, and reality shows them it's not. As a stake holder in Bitcoin, I can't AFFORD to wait until that day happens, action must be taken before that day happens.