Lol, I never said no one would like to be his own bank. You, for one, clearly do. I'd advise against it for now, though. For now, just focus on learning the difference between statements of fact and overbroad generalizations.
Ok, who is saying who is guilty of overboard generalizations here? I never said I wanted to be my own bank. Nor did I say that you thought nobody would want to be their own bank. My comments weren't even directed exclusively at you. Check that vanity. The point I was making, is that while you and some other individuals enjoy easy access to credit, or might not be interested in being their own bank, there are others without all the same services and conveniences that would find the prospect to do so very liberating and highly beneficial. Making an argument that bitcoin has failed; it has no use; every function is already sufficiently provided for by another service so nobody could possibly want it is a very short sighted, ill-conceived point of view. Before you can feel accused once again, I'm not implying those perspectives are your own, but they are present here and using parts of your comments served to illustrate a point.
Want some overboard blanket statements?
bitcoin solves a problem that people don't have and will never have.
Most people don't want to be their own bank.
If you think people will ever want bitcoin for anything other than speculating or gambling, then you must be smoking something.
The quoted line, restored to its proper context, suggests that USD crashing to zero would be a cataclysmic event, while BTC tanking would, at worst, cause srs lulz.
Did I suggest the inevitable demise of USD and bitcoin being our only salvation? No. Bitcoin is a tool that has the potential to assist in liberating and benefiting people everywhere, whether in economic turmoil or not.