Post
Topic
Board Development & Technical Discussion
Re: sendtoaddress sendmany api change proposal.
by
btc4ever
on 01/10/2014, 18:43:17 UTC
oh and also, if you look at this pseudo code again:

Quote
// business application pseudo-code

while( num_tries++ < max_tries ) {

   fee = rpc.calcsendfee( address, amount )

   if( not fee_is_ok( fee ) )
       break;

   code = rpc.sendtoaddress( address, amount, .., fee )

   if( code != insufficient_fee ) {
      break;
   }
}


Notice that there is a new fee parameter to sendtoaddress(), which in this case is the value returned by calcsendfee().

That fee would act as a limit for sendtoaddress.    So if the fee that sendtoaddress generates pseudo-randomly is higher than the limit, then it would not send and would return an "insufficient fee" code.   If it is less or equal, then it would send.

So I believe that handles your objection.