Great, so let's see if I understand the timeline:

-You take a screen cap of your list of bets while checking after a loss streak. Nonce 3933 is missing from the list of bets.

-You take screen grabs of your individual bets, which includes nonce 3932 and 3934, but the client seed is missing. You can't get it until you randomize your seed, which will make your previous seed available.

-You randomize your seed so you can check your previous bets during your loss streak.

-Your list of bets changes to add in nonce 3933, a bet you say was completely fabricated but which was "won." This also changes the value of the the bet with nonce 3934 to be higher than you originally bet, which cancels out the winnings of the nonce 3933 bet.

Is that correct? Anything to add or correct? Did your balance change after you randomized to reflect the change in the value of your losing bet, or was that money already missing from your balance?

If that timeline is correct, what would be the purpose of fabricating a winning bet and then changing the value of the bet after it to cancel it out? If the scam is to alter bet values of losing bets, why not just do that without fabricating winning bets?

 It would seem that if bet values are being changed, there would have to be a point where you make a losing bet and MORE money than you lost is deducted from your account, and then the bet values are made to match when you randomize, OR when you randomize your bets and the bet values of losing bets change, money would suddenly disappear from your balance. Which one is happening here?