So you just want the miners to receive less, but not disappear totally, right?
Yes. They will serve as Plan B, but the backup plan shouldn't be 4X as expensive as Plan A.
Ok, that atleast sounds reasonable, and not as crazy as getting rid of mining altogether.
I still have a gut feeling that the masternode network is not at all as secure and reliable as many here want to make me believe.
It will be, it is supposed to, but we are not there yet. This needs years to improve.
I am just guessing, I can't prove it, I admit, but this needs more careful longtime testing.
Ah shit, now it sounds as if I am FUDing, when I am just tired. I need some sleep.