My vocal opposition is due to your shills
Then it is based on a false premise, since we have never employed any shills.
Given the foundation of your position being false, you might want to reconsider it, at least if you are going to be honest and logically consistent about it at all. Obviously you are not forced to.
You don't have to employ shills to have shills, and I don't have to take your word that you don't employ shills. Out of respect for my own well being I choose not to.
Not employing shills is not "having" shills. As it could not be considered to be his shills if they weren't employed by Smooth.
You have unfounded assumptions about shills being around.
Seems like you may have gotten the word shill and supporter mixed up. Or are they the same to you?
