Post
Topic
Board Archival
Re: delete
by
Spoetnik
on 04/10/2014, 02:03:40 UTC
-blah-

Jimbob...you read our Monero Research Lab's very first publication, right? You know the one where we spoke about a cascading privacy failure if an attacker owned sufficient outputs? Here's a link for you to save yourself. At any rate, this could occur in a CryptoNote coin where persons unknown to everyone else controlled, to thumb suck an example, 82% of all the outputs. That would be an exceedingly unsafe CryptoNote coin to use, as those person(s) could easily reveal the actual signature of just about any transaction, thus negating any benefit of ring signatures.

When choose a currency to shill for, you really should choose one that doesn't have that flaw.

and.. you couldn't have just contributed to the Cryptonote project itself ?
Was there some reason you had to use the platform and make a clone coin of your own.. to flog around here non stop ?

The whole we had to make our own clone coin excuses routine never gets old around here LOL
1,001 MoneroShill Coin
1,002 HeyLookMathEquations Coin
1,003 IiPostAtBCTalkToomuch Coin
1,004 FartingDinosaur Coin
....

you guys are busted.. your pumping / hyping /spamming about a clone coin to make Bitcoin to cash out to buy Lambo's .
cut the crap.