Thank you for the fair review. Following what you said I draw the conclusion that I am not talking rubbish (whatever that means) about the competitor (AM). I am not saying this to win the bet and I admit that the only out of line reply was the "weener" one directed at FC, not AM.
Here's what Sebastian said:
Talking rubbish can mean lying, speaking nonsense, dumb things and so on. The examples mabsark gave seems to show that real informations are missing so everything that could be done is guessing about what is going on.
and here's what I said earlier:
Because I know for a fact that I can produce a quote of you talking rubbish (trolling, telling lies, spreading rumours, presenting opinion as facts) about AM in the shareholder thread.
I guess Sebastian missed that. He did however say that your "facts" were nothing but speculation which was one of the things I included for talking rubbish - presenting opinion as fact.
The rest of the trolling examples that Mabsark gave are just normal questions/reality facts. For example the "So chips are being sold, but the dividends are still missing." reply seems to me just a statement of what is going on. I don't see how can this qualify as trolling. It's not a lie and it's not trash talk. It's a pure real fact!
After repeatedly making replies of pretty much "Whatever, where's the dividends? LOL" of course that's trolling. Or do you just have a case of recurring amnesia?
@Mabsark want to find someone else to judge this bet?
If you want.