How would you and others feel about a Kimoto Gravity Well hard-fork?
I am for it! Look into newer coin's code if you plan to implement KGW, their are some known exploits with KGW. DarkGravityWave is another option.
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=505243.20Yes, I am familiar with some security issues, good call! This looks like the route that will benefit ROC the most!
Edit: I skimmed over the DarkGravityWell Source -> It looks promising. We may have to go with the DGW


If the developer fixed/changed the difficulty re-target issue with a hard fork.....then would that mean a hard fork would make current coins we hold invalid??

Do not worry -- All Coins Will Be Okay!:
- We Keep Several Backups of the Blockchain in Cold-Storage
- Handwritten Checkpoints Ready To Be Indexed
- We Have A Functioning ROC-TestNet Network -> Will be used to test and analyze the KGW Hard-Fork
- On TestNet we each have over several million ROC. We will ensure that no-coins are lost
- I spoke with Dr. Kimoto several months back and was graciously helped out to ensure ROCs parameters best reflect the main goal and primary directive of RedOakCoin
- If anyone is interested in helping out; We will post the TestNet-Testing Time's! It will be cool, I would like to show people how our Decay System actually works

Just wanted to thank everyone for keeping up with ROC even though we have hit a small difficulty bump.
--Aetheros
--Vulcan