So, lets see. Numerous edits were not made, in fact NO edits were made. As no edits were made, there could not have been a chance to of "leaving in place facts that were no longer true." Since the page wasn't edited, there was no "people editing the page knew they were no longer true statements" and by logical deduction, they could not have "chose to leave them in place."
I'm talking about other quotes on the Monarch page that were left in place even when they were no longer true. I showed one example (there are many). Why don't you address that issue instead of avoiding it? Let's start with the claim "BFL is the only 28nm chip manufacturer on its 2nd generation ASIC." Why was that quote left in place during edits even when it was no longer true?
Just admit you were wrong or that you lied to try and make your point and you got caught (again) and we can move on.
You first.
Why would I do that? I am not wrong. I showed you that I was not wrong. I showed you that you were wrong (or I am betting you just lied, because that's what you do). So do tell, why would I admit I was wrong when that is simply not the case?
If you really don't understand why the deceptive information on your website is such a big deal, then there is no reasoning with you. This isn't just a simple failure of omission. It's willful deception.
You were updating that website regularly, as the multiple snapshots on the Wayback Machine show. You could have - and indeed were required to - remove the misleading, incorrect information at any time. But instead you chose to maintain the fiction - publicly - that your tapeout occurred in August. As the Skype chat logs show, you were aware of that fact personally and reminded the other principals at BFL of it on a regular basis.
Those are the lies I'm talking about. Those are the lies that caused the FTC to shut you down.