...but we have to do better than that to graduate from FUD.
What is your guess about this vaporware below?
How the hell do I know? Correct would be especially hard to say if it is unpublished, since that would limit who might be scrutinizing it for errors or unstated (here at least) assumptions.
Cool I wanted to see how you reacted to lack of data. Because it seemed you were implying that probing is FUD. Nicholas Taleb made his fortune on the Taleb distribution, which is basically correctly valuing long tail events. You would not be well served to assume just because my probing doesn't find a vulnerability that BCX could attack, that means I never find anything earth shattering.
I am 90% certain that what I wrote exists and doesn't have an error, because it is quite simple, at least on first thoughts.