limited by the dynamic headroom of the initial innovation.
i do agree with this. however it is much more normal for genuis inventions to be ruined by lack of adoption, maintenance, and improvement than it is for inventions to be limited by technological factors they did not originally take into consideration.
in fact often it is the improvements that raise the ceiling beyond what the original invention had.
in specific case there are examples - but the majority of failures rest on those three things IMO
i feel the entire cryptocurrency world is majorly screwed and nobody is for sure what will work because it's unprecedented (except for tulip bulbs & beenie babies). So sometimes we reference technology & sometimes we reference currencies and just pull stuff out of our ass that sounds good to us at the time.
but none of us really have a fucking clue (or that's what i feel like sometimes)