That's exactly my fear. I too would like to hear more about whitenotwrights divident solution. That does indeed sound like an interesting solution. Though I am quite concerned about the current funding hurdles I find some comfort in the fact that the devs are clearly hearing the community out on this. This may be a votable issue.
I am in agreement with WhiteNotWright. In my opinion, a new coin is not the way to go. Why not simply focus on FIBRE? Get to marketing, create buzz, continue to innovate, garner ideas from the community and implement. Any amount of effort that is focused on another coin will take away from FIBRE. If you build value in FIBRE, the money will come....
There is another pair of coins that was quite a different but somewhat similar scenario. Anyway, the original plan was for them to create a new coin and exchange for the current holders of their existing coin. For whatever reason they chose to create the new coin and keep both coins which resulted in the first coin being basically worth nothing. This is not to say that it will change in the future, but as of this moment, I am a bagholder of the original coins. With that stated, the devs and the team of the said coin are good people, with a good "mission" but in my opinion their "vision" was flawed and not well thought out.
Speaking as a Top 20 holder of FIBRE,
SB_
Correct! Even tho I see FibreLite as the best solution, this is the communities decision and is not mine to make. I'm holding Fibre like the rest of you, I would never jeopardize my investment.
Things are going really well and we have seen massive growth over the last two months. I do not want this too slow down!