Quote from: folhowk on October 07, 2014, 10:14:22 PM

Quote from: coinweaver on October 06, 2014, 06:05:40 PM

I don't read PMs here and I've never received an email from you that I can recall.

I'm not impressed by the Proof of Developer system because it can be and has been too easily gamed by bad actors. They don't like to admit this, but they cannot argue it has not happened.

Coins are DACs. We launched a coin specific to the parameters and business use case described to us by our client over many, many hours of conversation. That someone is soliciting for more developers isn't a bad thing. That's what gives coins a long lifespan. The code was released open source per our client's instructions for just that reason.

Anything else is simply grandstanding for the forums and I ignore it.

Nobody needs permission to work on a Blocktech coin that is open source. That's what open source means. Do as you please.

If people spend more time on the forums whining and bitching while claiming to have the requisite knowledge *instead* of fixing the problems then their alleged "expertise" speaks for itself.

That's not a criticism of you specifically, but of this thread and those who mistakenly view themselves as competitors to our business simply because they can hash a genesis block.

I'm sorry Bryce but it is hard to believe that this agreement between you and the company is legitimate, knowing that your ties with the Coinmarkets Cartel run deep. The idea of this coin is great, but no way in hell I'm touching it with the cartel as deeply entrenched in this coin as they are. This whole thing reeks of a classic Cartel bait and switch premine pump and dump.