We are not using the crap Android wallet that every other coin clones because- 1) it is not very good from a code-perspective and we prefer clean, maintainable code and 2) we plan to enable all syscoin services on mobile (ios/android)- offers, certs, aliases, data and the other services we have on the roadmap (assets, escrow, multisig encryption and more). To facilitate this we need code that we can build on, scale, and maintain- for this reason nearly all of our "apps" are written from scratch including the mobile wallets. We will have some very cool stuff rolling out this month!
This is my first post, because i am one of the developers of one of the 'crap' Android wallet you refer. I had a lot of hope on your team, i was one of the initial investors and followed the evolution of the coin from the start, all bugs, botched releases, bad QA control, everything. And never complained once, never.
And after all that, you have the nerve to call crap to others work ? Really guys ? i sold all my coins today because you really have shown that you are just a group of childish amateurs. Also your 'team' of developers consists on just one person, you can see exactly the same style in all code. With such investment you asked from people you just have one person that does most (all ? ) coding .
You delete posts that offends your work but you are happy to call crap to other software, that i am sure you even don't understand it how hypocrite is that ?
To investors : i really hope coin succeed and you win some money, i am out of here
When I read you called that wallet crap, I cringed also. Be professional, please.
There are multiple android crypto currency wallets available for open source usage and for code purchase on multiple different marketplaces. I would like to know why you are assuming the code I am speaking about is your code? I did not link to any specific code so please let me know how you are inferring that the code which I'm referring to is yours?
In either case you're right using the term "crap " was unprofessional what I should've said was we have hired a professional android developer they reviewed one of the most popular android wallets for crypto currency's and determined that it was not worth investing more time into that CodeBase. Given the scope of syscoin, it's features, and the services we want to deliver in the wallet it would be more prudent to start again from scratch.
Yeah, exactly you should have said that. That is my point.
As i told in other posts i didn't (couldn't ? ) take it personal, what frustrated me more is the attitude, it's like you really can't learn how to deal with public relations and it is ironic that you as an official member of the project refers others work in that terms, after all there were more trouble with your wallet code than most android 'crap' wallets that i know of.
And most of that 'crap' is actually working with promised features.
It surprises me that you hired someone to review wallets, shouldn't your team do that task ? after all you guys are the only who knows what to implement and how.
As i said, if you guys had some minimum experience to manage a project big enough you would never ever deal with issues the way you deal with them, and some times it seems you didn't learn. And it is not just PR it's about project management, hit dead lines etc etc.
I know you guys mean well, but you shoot yourselves in the foot in every given opportunity, and what is worse try to fix the mistakes with more mistakes.
I really hope that you can manage your act and succeed and learn.