I honestly can't conceive of anything simpler than a Ponzi scheme.
So therefore, we are limited by your myopia?
Yes, exactly. When a person makes a claim and doesn't support it , the claim is invalid unless we already have some support for it. Since we have no support for it already, the claim is in fact limited by our myopia.
Where's the support for your claim that he is a ponzi? High interest rate isn't enough. Do you have evidence of pirate failing to pay any returns? Has he been late (longer than say an hour)? Has ANYONE been screwed by pirate? In short, until you provide solid evidence, you're just a bunch of FUD.