The devs not responding to these comments (and they do know this is going on) just further demonstrates how little credibility this guy has.
I'll be blunt. The devs not responding is not a good thing. Look at how many pages have been filled with this stuff. There are many of us that want to hear real technical answers to things and don't get them. For example, I want to know what the size of the transactions will be with low mixes compared to CN coins as opposed to those given in the whitepaper as a selling point for chandran sigs. When I brought it up before, I was labeled a troll/fuder etc and got no answers.
When I asked real question about BTCD, jl777 answered me. When I asked questions about SDC, the dev answered me. Fact is, I could list a few more coins where the dev actually answered my questions but in here, all you get is posts about how this is the second coming and posts get buried with images.
Granted, unlike this guy, I didn't go into those other threads and come out saying it was crap and vaporware, but still, some of us would like some real technical discussions and when we don't see any, it does not reflect well on the coin and the devs.
Not an unreasonable request, but you should similarly see that it's not unreasonable to ignore the request. For example, in the early days of XC, which despite its other failings has seen many technical successes, Dan answered technical questions in the thread all the time. Then he clearly realized that was a massive drain on his time and not worth it as for every intelligent and well meaning technical question he had to wade through a pile of worthless troll questions. Parallel here is that while your question is reasonable, does the dev really need to take his time to deal with longandshort, who doesn't have an argument and just shouts that he doesn't think the project will work? So maybe dev decides he'd rather just focus on coding rather than putting himself at the beck and call of Random People On The Internet and answers neither question.