Let's just get this all out in the open , deal with it and then forget about it. The origins of the coin and those involved are not all that important at this stage to me. I feel that whatever the start only a few well known hash whales that had bots monitoring the board grabbed it all up and then lost interest and dumped. DI told bill, he brought in a ton of investors, they grabbed a little of each and sit on it. There is not much for sale. Little sells and buys make the price fluctuate a lot. The vast majority never comes near the market.
That's your opinion and I respect that. You can always ignore me just like "maok" is doing if you are irritated by my posts.
I don't react on comments from sockpuppets of DI (like "nixon99" and "Hilux74")
As long as I don't know the truth about Quark (who is really controlling Quark (is it decentralized or one person??))
I haven' ignored you, but I asked politely not to quote scammer's posts.
Like cryptohunter I don't understand what you are trying to accomplish, some of your points have been refuted, like the big purse holders doing 100K transactions(turned out to be exchanges) or the mining from day 1(turned out that anybody could mine); while the rest of your points have never been proven like `sockpuppets`(we couldn't because we don't have access to btctalk logs or reddit logs..)
As for shakezula he helped Max in the initial phase of Quark and from there on Max has admitted to be involved in development of other coins as well but like you know very well from the chats few months ago Max stated that he will continue to support Quark and has done so until now. Quark may have got the initial idea of multiple hashing from Sifcoin(you can read that in
Max interview as well) but has implemented the extra 3 random algos which is what makes Quark unique. Later on Max also implemented protection against double spends attacks and has maintained and is continually upgrading the code.
As long as I don't know the truth about Quark (who is really controlling Quark (is it decentralized or one person??))
I'm sorry but this doesn't make any sense, controlling Quark ? From what perspective? protocol/market/socially?? Please do search for the truth but so far you only spread theories which are almost or as worst as that Kkk scammer conspiracy theories about Bitcoin...